Note:
In the system of 10 characters as the generation of numbers, there is no 0? That's Interesting, let's see;
X = Equivalent < 1
x = The amount of x is counted unitwise. < 1..2...3...4...5..6..7...8...9..,
Ok;
The Law is permit limit of system of 10 characters.
Let's see;
(A) xxxxxxxxxx < 10
(B) XXXXXXXXXX <10
A < B = NULL
When the system is null, it is an invalidate operation; desicant that of an X (a) in x (b), and thus the same valley x (b) in X (a).
Let's see;
(A) xxxxxxxxxx < 10
(B) XXXXXXXXXX <10
* (C) XXXXxXXXXX <1111111111
* (D) XxXXXXXXXX < 1111111111
* (E) XXXXXxXXXX < 1111111111
C< D < E = NULL
"We can notice that the repetition continues from number 1, causes nullity, the pattern has no logic; Because x is a variant that gives sustainability in significant number Generation."
Let's see;
(A) xxxxxxxxxx < 10
(B) XXXXXXXXXX <10
* (C) XXXXxXXXXX <1111111111
* (D) XxXXXXXXXX < 1111111111
* (E) XXXXXxXXXX < 1111111111
* (F) XXXXxxXXXx < 1111121111
Note; F < OK!
Let's see;
(A) xxxxxxxxxx < 10
(B) XXXXXXXXXX <10
* (C) XXXXxXXXXX <1111111111
* (D) XxXXXXXXXX < 1111111111
* (E) XXXXXxXXXX < 1111111111
* (F) XXXXxxXXXx < 1111121111
* (G) XXxxXXXXXx < 112111111
Note; F < G = POSITION x NOT IS EQUAL , POSITION x CREATE THE CONTROLLER OF DIFFERENT CODIFICATION.
Alert; To RESULT IS NECESSARY CONJUNCTION OF "x" NO of "X";
XxxxxxXXXX < 154 ok!
XxXxXxxxxx < 111115 ok!
xXxXxXXXXX < 1111111111 null
By J. P. M. Filho 03/04
In the system of 10 characters as the generation of numbers, there is no 0? That's Interesting, let's see;
X = Equivalent < 1
x = The amount of x is counted unitwise. < 1..2...3...4...5..6..7...8...9..,
Ok;
The Law is permit limit of system of 10 characters.
Let's see;
(A) xxxxxxxxxx < 10
(B) XXXXXXXXXX <10
A < B = NULL
When the system is null, it is an invalidate operation; desicant that of an X (a) in x (b), and thus the same valley x (b) in X (a).
Let's see;
(A) xxxxxxxxxx < 10
(B) XXXXXXXXXX <10
* (C) XXXXxXXXXX <1111111111
* (D) XxXXXXXXXX < 1111111111
* (E) XXXXXxXXXX < 1111111111
C< D < E = NULL
"We can notice that the repetition continues from number 1, causes nullity, the pattern has no logic; Because x is a variant that gives sustainability in significant number Generation."
Let's see;
(A) xxxxxxxxxx < 10
(B) XXXXXXXXXX <10
* (C) XXXXxXXXXX <1111111111
* (D) XxXXXXXXXX < 1111111111
* (E) XXXXXxXXXX < 1111111111
* (F) XXXXxxXXXx < 1111121111
Note; F < OK!
Let's see;
(A) xxxxxxxxxx < 10
(B) XXXXXXXXXX <10
* (C) XXXXxXXXXX <1111111111
* (D) XxXXXXXXXX < 1111111111
* (E) XXXXXxXXXX < 1111111111
* (F) XXXXxxXXXx < 1111121111
* (G) XXxxXXXXXx < 112111111
Note; F < G = POSITION x NOT IS EQUAL , POSITION x CREATE THE CONTROLLER OF DIFFERENT CODIFICATION.
Alert; To RESULT IS NECESSARY CONJUNCTION OF "x" NO of "X";
XxxxxxXXXX < 154 ok!
XxXxXxxxxx < 111115 ok!
xXxXxXXXXX < 1111111111 null
By J. P. M. Filho 03/04