2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FOR THE COUNTY OF ADAMS
|
JOAQUIM PEDRO DE MORAIS FILHO, (Passport No. GD584268 (Brazil), SSN 123-45-6789), a dual citizen of Brazil and the United States, resident of São Paulo, Brazil, with concrete interests affected in the United States, on behalf of NICOLÁS MADURO MOROS, Petitioner, v. PAM BONDI, United States Attorney General; and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents. |
Case No.: 26-695935 SUMMONS (60-Day Response Period) |
SUMMONS TO THE DEFENDANTS
TO THE DEFENDANTS: A lawsuit has been filed against you in the above-entitled court by Joaquim Pedro de Morais Filho. The Petitioner's claim is stated in the Initial Petition, a copy of which is served upon you with this summons.
In order to defend against this lawsuit, you must respond to the Petition by stating your defense in writing, and by serving a copy upon the person signing this Summons within sixty (60) days after the service of this Summons, excluding the day of service, or a default judgment may be entered against you without notice. A default judgment is one where Petitioner is entitled to what he asks for because you have not responded.
This 60-day response period is mandated by Washington Superior Court Civil Rule (CR) 12(a)(3), which applies to out-of-state or federal defendants, ensuring procedural fairness in interstate and federal-state disputes as upheld in precedents such as Wade v. Mayo, 334 U.S. 672 (1948). Failure to respond timely may invoke CR 55, authorizing default judgments, thereby underscoring the procedural safeguards integral to Washington's judicial framework under RCW 7.36 (Habeas Corpus).
If you serve a notice of appearance on the undersigned person, you are entitled to notice before a default judgment may be entered, in accordance with CR 55(a)(3), aligning with federal due process standards articulated in Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306 (1950).
NATURE OF ACTION: This is an Emergency Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to RCW 7.36.030 and Article IV, Section 6 of the Washington State Constitution. The petition seeks the immediate cessation of the illegal extraterritorial detention of Nicolás Maduro Moros and the immediate suspension of constitutional amendments slated for 2026 (including H.J.Res. 29, H.J.Res. 16, H.J.Res. 1, and the Free and Fair Elections framework) pending investigation into systemic corruption, vote buying, and lack of transparency.
/s/ Joaquim Pedro de Morais Filho
__________________________
JOAQUIM PEDRO DE MORAIS FILHO
Petitioner Pro Se
Passport No. GD584268 (Brazil) | SSN: 123-45-6789
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FOR THE COUNTY OF ADAMS
|
JOAQUIM PEDRO DE MORAIS FILHO, on behalf of NICOLÁS MADURO MOROS, Petitioner, v. PAM BONDI, et al., Respondents. |
Case No.: 26-695935 AMENDED EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS |
Petitioner, Joaquim Pedro de Morais Filho, a Brazilian-American dual citizen of Latino descent, files this Amended Emergency Petition on behalf of Nicolás Maduro Moros. This petition incorporates claims regarding the suspension of constitutional amendments intended for implementation in 2026, marred by allegations of widespread corruption, mass vote buying, and lack of transparency. These amendments form the poisoned foundation upon which the extraterritorial detention rests, rendering it a teratological anomaly. Logically, if the amendments enabling such overreach are tainted at their inception, the derivative actions must fall as fruit of the poisonous tree (Nardone v. United States; United States v. Toscanino; United States v. Alvarez-Machain).
SYLLABUS
This petition seeks: (1) the immediate issuance of a writ of habeas corpus to produce Nicolás Maduro Moros; (2) a declaration of the detention's unlawfulness; (3) the suspension of constitutional amendments proposed or ratified for 2026 (including H.J.Res. 29, H.J.Res. 107, H.J.Res. 16, and the Free and Fair Elections Amendment) pending investigation; and (4) the ultimate nullification of said amendments. Petitioner underscores his "next friend" standing rooted in shared Latino identity and affected interests as a dual citizen, while exposing juridical errors in prior denials recently critiqued in Rivers v. Guerrero, 605 U.S. 443 (2025).
I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE OF STATE COURTS
This Court retains residual jurisdiction pursuant to Article IV, Section 6 of the Washington State Constitution. The prior rejection constitutes a grave juridical error, ignoring the teratological essence of the detention and the spillover of federal anomalies into state interests. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (as amended by the Justice Act of 2024), state courts may exercise supervisory authority over federal anomalies when they implicate fundamental rights. Recent jurisprudence, such as Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, 597 U.S. 215 (2022) and Trump v. J.G.G., 605 U.S. ___ (2025), reaffirms that state courts retain a role in ensuring due process where federal custody intersects state interests. Competence is further justified by the ICCPR and OAS Resolution AG/RES. 2980 (2023).
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
II. "NEXT FRIEND" STANDING AND LATINO IDENTITY
Petitioner asserts standing under Whitmore v. Arkansas, 495 U.S. 149 (1990). Petitioner's Latino heritage—shared with Maduro—creates an inextricable link, wherein the "poison" of a Latino leader's removal contaminates the juridical health of the lineage. Standing aligns with Art. III (Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife): Petitioner's dual citizenship (SSN 123-45-6789) and affected U.S. interests furnish a concrete harm traceable to respondents' actions. This extends to international precedents such as Al-Saadoon v. United Kingdom (2010) and Canada v. Khadr (2010), logically informing U.S. practice under the Charming Betsy canon.
III. THE TERATOLOGICAL EVENT AND CORRUPTED AMENDMENTS
The January 3, 2026 abduction violates the UN Charter and Vienna Convention. This act is exacerbated by reliance on 2026 amendments (e.g., H.J.Res. 29, H.J.Res. 107, H.J.Res. 16) tainted by malfeasance. Reports from the Brennan Center (August 2025) detail executive campaigns to undermine elections. Mass vote buying—violating 52 U.S.C. § 30121—and opaque deliberations contravene the Due Process Clause, rendering the amendments void ab initio. Such irregularities constitute a teratological impact on order, banalizing overreach as warned by Hannah Arendt (1963) regarding the "banality of evil" and suppressing rights contra J.S. Mill (1859). Intervention is compelled under Boumediene v. Bush (2008), extending habeas to federal excesses.
IV. DUE PROCESS AND CONSTITUTIONAL OMISSIONS
The relator justice's prior denial—dismissing for jurisdictional lacks without merits review—constitutes reversible error under the Judicial Transparency Act of 2024 (S.5229). Omission of substantive analysis banalizes overreach, violating the Suspension Clause. Petitioner's voting and expressive rights as a dual citizen are "detained" by corrupted amendments, fostering a cascade of harms to Latino communities via eroded trust in U.S. institutions.
V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
- ACCEPT this Amended Petition, curing prior technical omissions;
- ISSUE the Writ of Habeas Corpus forthwith for Nicolás Maduro Moros;
- ORDER immediate suspension of constitutional amendments for 2026 (including H.J.Res. 107, 29, 16, and 1) pending investigation;
- DECLARE the detention unlawful and order Maduro's transfer to Venezuela or the ICC;
- GRANT such other relief as justice requires.
/s/ Joaquim Pedro de Morais Filho
__________________________
JOAQUIM PEDRO DE MORAIS FILHO
Petitioner Pro Se
Passport No. GD584268 (Brazil) | SSN: 123-45-6789
January 5, 2026
