PRO SE FILING: Notice of Appeal and IFP Motion - Case No. 1:26-cv-02112-GBD (De Morais Filho)

sábado, 9 de maio de 2026
Dear Clerk of Court, please find attached my formal Notice of Appeal and the corresponding Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal, including the required Financial Affidavit, for filing in Case No. 1:26-cv-02112-GBD (Joaquim Pedro De Morais Filho v. DHS et al.). As a pro se litigant currently residing in Brazil, I am submitting these scanned, hand-signed documents electronically to ensure they are timely filed within the statutory deadline following the Order of Dismissal entered on April 15, 2026. I respectfully request that these documents be properly docketed and that the Notice of Appeal be processed and transmitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Thank you for your time and assistance.


Notice of Appeal & Complete IFP Affidavit

Pacote Completo de Apelação (Pronto para Imprimir)

Instruções antes de enviar:
1. Clique no botão azul abaixo para exportar para PDF ou imprimir as 7 páginas.
2. Pegue uma caneta azul ou preta.
3. Assine a Página 1 (Notice of Appeal).
4. Assine a Página 3 (Motion for IFP).
5. Assine e coloque a data na Página 4 e na Página 7 (Declaração Financeira).
6. Coloque tudo num envelope e envie para Nova York (SDNY Pro Se Intake Unit).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JOAQUIM PEDRO DE MORAIS FILHO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

-against-

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), U.S.
IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS
ENFORCEMENT (ICE), WELLS FARGO &
COMPANY, and JPMORGAN CHASE
BANK, N.A.,

Defendants-Appellees.
:
:
:
:
X
:
:
:
:
:
:
X


Case No. 1:26-cv-02112-GBD


NOTICE OF APPEAL

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Joaquim Pedro De Morais Filho, Plaintiff in the above-named case, hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from the Order of Dismissal entered in this action on the 15th day of April, 2026.

Dated: May 9, 2026


Respectfully submitted,

_______________________________________
Joaquim Pedro De Morais Filho
Pro Se Plaintiff-Appellant
Rua Raimundo Mendes de Carvalho, 840
Icarai, Caucaia - CE
CEP: 61.620-130
Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
Phone: +55 85 991253990
Email: j360074@hotmail.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JOAQUIM PEDRO DE MORAIS FILHO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

-against-

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.
:
:
:
:
X
:
:
:
X

Case No. 1:26-cv-02112-GBD


MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL

Pursuant to Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff-Appellant Joaquim Pedro De Morais Filho respectfully moves this Court for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, and to waive the $605.00 appellate filing fee.

In support of this motion, Plaintiff states the following:

1. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THE ORDER: I declare that I was made aware today, May 9, 2026, of the Court's Order of Dismissal entered on April 15, 2026.

2. OPPOSITION AND GRAVITY OF THE SITUATION: I respectfully, yet firmly, oppose the District Court's decision to dismiss this action as "frivolous" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). I submit this appeal in absolute good faith, as the underlying complaint raises profound, unsettled questions of Constitutional law and fundamental human rights that demand rigorous appellate review.

This appeal challenges an unprecedented, systemic, and unconstitutional machinery of wealth extraction operating in the shadow of federal immigration enforcement. The United States government (DHS/ICE) forcibly removes non-citizens, while highly regulated financial institutions (Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase)—acting under the color of federal anti-money laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) frameworks—exploit this government-mandated physical absence. These banks weaponize geographic impossibilities (e.g., foreign IP blocks, U.S.-only SMS authentication, and mandatory in-branch visitation policies) to systematically lock deported individuals out of their lawfully earned, federally insured deposits.

This orchestrated sequence constitutes a "proxy taking" and a de facto civil asset forfeiture operating entirely outside judicial bounds. The District Court disregarded over a century of established Supreme Court precedent:

a. Fifth Amendment Protections for Aliens: The District Court implicitly endorsed the fallacy that extraterritorial non-citizens forfeit their property rights upon removal. This contradicts Wong Wing v. United States (1896) and Plyler v. Doe (1982).

b. Procedural Due Process: Under Mathews v. Eldridge (1976), the current bureaucratic architecture fails constitutional scrutiny. The private interest is absolute (my life savings); the risk of deprivation is 100%.

c. State Action Doctrine: Pursuant to Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co. (1982), private parties (the Respondent banks) executing state-sponsored deprivations under federal compliance directives are rendered "state actors."

3. FINANCIAL HARDSHIP: Due to the very actions challenged in this lawsuit—my physical deportation and the subsequent freezing of my U.S.-based financial assets by the Respondent banks—I am currently facing severe financial hardship in Brazil. I am unable to prepay the $605.00 docket fees for this appeal. My fundamental constitutional right to appeal should not be barred by the poverty engineered by the Respondents.

Attached to this motion is my completed Affidavit in Support of Motion (Financial Declaration) detailing my absolute inability to pay the appellate fees.

Dated: May 9, 2026


Respectfully submitted,

_______________________________________
Joaquim Pedro De Morais Filho
Pro Se Plaintiff-Appellant
Application to Appeal In Forma Pauperis
Affidavit in Support of Motion
Appeal No. To Be Assigned District Court No. 1:26-cv-02112-GBD
Instructions: Complete all questions in this application and then sign it. Do not leave any blanks: if the answer to a question is "0," "none," or "not applicable (N/A)," write that response.

I swear or affirm under penalty of perjury that, because of my poverty, I cannot prepay the docket fees of my appeal or post a bond for them. I believe I am entitled to redress. I swear or affirm under penalty of perjury under United States laws that my answers on this form are true and correct. (28 U.S.C § 1746; 18 U.S.C. § 1621)

Signed: ____________________________________________ Date: May 9, 2026
My issues on appeal are:
Violation of 5th Amendment Due Process and Takings Clause; unconstitutional
asset freezing/escheatment by state proxies; erroneous dismissal of complaint.
1. For both you and your spouse estimate the average amount of money received from each of the following sources during the past 12 months. Use gross amounts.
Income source Average monthly amount during the past 12 months Amount expected next month
You Spouse You Spouse
Employment$0N/A$0N/A
Self-employment$0N/A$0N/A
Income from real property$0N/A$0N/A
Interest and dividends$0N/A$0N/A
Gifts / Alimony / Child Support$0N/A$0N/A
Retirement / Disability$0N/A$0N/A
Unemployment / Public-assistance$0N/A$0N/A
Other (Family support for food)$50 (Est.)N/A$50 (Est.)N/A
Total monthly income:$50N/A$50N/A
2. List your employment history for the past two years, most recent employer first.
Employer Address Dates of employment Gross monthly pay
None (Unemployed)N/AN/A$0
N/AN/AN/A$0
3. List your spouse's employment history for the past two years.
Employer Address Dates of employment Gross monthly pay
N/A (Not married)N/AN/A$0
4. How much cash do you and your spouse have? $0
Below, state any money you or your spouse have in bank accounts or in any other financial institution.
Financial Institution Type of Account Amount you have Amount spouse has
Wells Fargo & CompanyChecking/Savings$0 accessible (FROZEN)N/A
JPMorgan Chase BankChecking/Savings$0 accessible (FROZEN)N/A

*Note: As detailed in the complaint, all my assets in the U.S. have been unconstitutionally frozen by the Defendants utilizing AML/KYC policies, leaving me with $0 of accessible funds.

5. List the assets, and their values, which you own or your spouse owns. Do not list clothing and ordinary household furnishings.
Home / Real Estate Motor vehicle #1 Motor vehicle #2 Other assets
None ($0) None ($0) None ($0) None ($0)
6. State every person, business, or organization owing you or your spouse money, and the amount owed.
Person owing you money Amount owed to you Amount owed to your spouse
None$0N/A
7. State the persons who rely on you or your spouse for support.
Name (or initials) Relationship Age
NoneN/AN/A
8. Estimate the average monthly expenses of you and your family. Show separately the amounts paid by your spouse.
Expense You Your Spouse
Rent or home-mortgage payment
Are real estate taxes included? [ ] Yes [ X ] No
$0 (Living w/ family) N/A
Utilities (electricity, heating fuel, water, sewer, and telephone) $0 (Paid by family) N/A
Home maintenance (repairs and upkeep) $0 N/A
Food $50 (Covered by family) N/A
Clothing / Laundry and dry-cleaning $0 N/A
Medical and dental expenses $0 N/A
Transportation (not including motor vehicle payments) $0 N/A
Recreation, entertainment, newspapers, magazines, etc. $0 N/A
Insurance (not deducted from wages or included in mortgage payments) $0 N/A
Taxes (not deducted from wages or included in mortgage payments) $0 N/A
Installment payments / Credit cards $0 N/A
Other (specify): None $0 N/A
Total monthly expenses: $50 N/A
9. Do you expect any major changes to your monthly income or expenses or in your assets or liabilities during the next 12 months?

No      Yes. If yes, describe on an attached sheet.
10. Have you paid - or will you be paying - an attorney any money for services in connection with this case, including the completion of this form?

No      Yes. If yes, how much? $_______
11. Provide any other information that will help explain why you cannot pay the docket fees for your appeal.
I was deported to Brazil and my entire life savings, which are held in accounts at Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase, have been entirely frozen by these institutions. As detailed in my underlying complaint, the banks have weaponized their AML/KYC policies to permanently lock me out of my accounts because I am physically barred from the United States and cannot receive U.S. SMS authentication or visit a branch. Because the Defendants have unlawfully seized constructive custody of 100% of my financial assets, I am currently destitute in Brazil, generating no income, and surviving solely on the charity of my family. I am entirely unable to pay the $605.00 appellate filing fee.
12. State the city and state of your legal residence.

Caucaia, Ceará, Brazil

Your daytime phone number: +55 85 991253990

Your age: 30     Your years of schooling: 12

Last four digits of your social-security number: 6789

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.


Executed on: May 9, 2026

_________________________________________________________
Joaquim Pedro De Morais Filho
(Signature)